马德兴：米利西奇不敢热身U17女足，一年半不换血，足协当断则断（马德兴：米利西奇回避与U17女足热身，球队一年半未换血，足协该果断决策）

Analyzing sports commentary

The user's message seems to be about a sports commentary headline in Chinese discussing Milicic and a women's U17 team issue. Since they haven't asked a clear question, they might seek a summary or context. I can briefly explain who Ante Milicic is—he's been the head coach of the China women's national team since 2024 and is of Australian-Croatian descent. I should consider asking how they’d like to proceed for more clarity!Understanding the headline

The coaching history indicates that the person previously coached the Australian women's team and Macarthur FC. The headline suggests some hesitation regarding arranging friendlies for the U17 women's team. "不敢热身U17女足" might mean he doesn't dare to field the U17 players in warm-up matches, which are often for testing fitness. The phrase "一年半不换血" implies not renewing the squad for 1.5 years, while "足协当断则断" suggests the FA should make decisive cuts. I'd consider if the user wants a summary, commentary, or my take!Offering a concise analysis

I can provide a brief analysis highlighting the main issues: there's a reluctance to integrate youth, no friendlies for the U17 team, stagnation in the squad, and unclear tactics. There's also a call for the CFA to make decisive changes, like enforcing a rejuvenation roadmap or setting KPIs for integrating U20/U17 players. I could suggest scheduling mixed training sessions and establishing domestic league minutes for younger players. Since the user only posted the headline, I should ask if they want a summary or my opinion.Summarizing the critique

I’m looking at Ma Dexing's critique of China’s women's national team head coach, Ante Milicic. The main claims are about avoiding U17 sparring, lack of squad rejuvenation over the past 18 months, and conservative management—suggesting they've lost the chance at the 2024 Asian Games. It's worth noting that the team previously failed to qualify for the 2024 Olympics under Shui Qingxia, and Milicic took over in mid-2024. So, by late 2025, his tenure will indeed match that 1.5-year mark mentioned in the critique.Analyzing the coaching challenges

I want to clarify that "当断则断" suggests the CFA should support youth integration KPIs or consider changing coaches. My analysis of why a coach might avoid U17 scrimmages includes concerns about morale if seniors lose, revealing weaknesses, injury risks, and scheduling conflicts. However, missing out on scrimmages is a missed opportunity to benchmark speed and intensity.

I propose a plan with steps like establishing a national team pathway and quarterly U17/U20 scrimmages. I'd like to know if the user wants a deeper analysis, a timeline of Milicic's tenure, or assistance in drafting a piece. I'll maintain a friendly tone and use clear bullet points without heavy formatting.